http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/environment/story.jsp?story=426530 The Independent Sceptics unconvinced as agribusiness welcomes opportunity to move forward By Michael McCarthy 22 July 2003 Reaction to yesterday's GM review, powerful though the report may have seemed, was expressed largely on what one might term party lines. While the GM companies, including Monsanto, warmly welcomed its conclusion that risk to human health from eating GM products was very low, sceptics concentrated on its concerns about the environment, and farmland wildlife in particular. The Agricultural Biotechnology Council, which represents the six main GM agribusiness firms in Britain, said it hoped "that this in-depth review of the science will now provide confidence for the UK to move forward with those other major developed and developing countries in the rest of the world that are already enjoying the benefits of this key technology." The Royal Society, Britain's national scientific academy which has disparaged claims for food risks from GM produce, also welcomed the food all-clear. "The Royal Society supports the report's findings that the risks associated with GM in terms of food safety and the creation of so-called superweeds are minimal," said Professor Jim Smith, who chaired the Royal Society working group on GM foods. "The report shows that recent attempts to create public anxiety about GM food safety, supported by sections of the media that are openly campaigning against GM, have been ignoring the scientific evidence. Of course, the safety of each novel food, whether GM or otherwise, needs to be assessed on a case-by-case basis." The questions about wild plants and animals were the main point of the report for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, which pointed out that the review had endorsed "fears that GM crops could accelerate the decline of some of our most popular songbirds". The report, it said, "backs warnings from the RSPB that the cultivation of GM crops, and particularly their management with broad-spectrum weedkillers, will deprive farmland birds of much essential food." Michael Meacher, the long-serving environment minister sacked in Tony Blair's last reshuffle and now a critic of the Government's intention to commercialise GM crops, said the review revealed the uncertainties around GM crops. "To introduce GM crops which no one wants, and for which there is no market, at the expense of organic, which people want more and more, would be ludicrous, bizarre and perverse," he said.