http://www.nature.com/nsu/021202/021202-2.html
Corn could make cotton pests Bt resistant
Insects offered GM-free refuges are eating modified crops further
afield.
4 December 2002
TOM CLARKE
Moths in the United States
are feeding on corn all
summer before flying
south to munch cotton in
the autumn, new research
shows1. The annual
exodus could stymie
future efforts to stem
pests' resistance to genetically modified crops.
Where the moths move between generations had
been hotly debated. The information is crucial to
preventing them from damaging economically important produce.
Fred Gould of North Carolina State University
in Raleigh and his colleagues used
techniques developed by archaeologists to track the
corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea) also known as the cotton
bollworm and tomato fruitworm.
Of the cotton in the southern United States, 40-60% is
engineered to contain the Bt gene from the bacterium
Bacillus thuringiensis. This enables the plant to produce a
toxin that is lethal to many pests. The technology has
reduced crop losses in this $40-billion industry.
The corn earworm develops resistance to Bt in the lab,
raising fears that if it were exposed for several generations
in the field, the pest would become inured to the toxin.
So, in an effort to ensure that some pests remain
susceptible, the amount of Bt cotton and corn grown in the
south is strictly controlled. Farmers must plant 'refuges' of
non-engineered crops between fields of genetically modified plants.
Gould's finding that the same moths feed on corn in
America's Midwest and cotton further south hints that the
refuge strategy alone might not hold back the spread of resistance.
For the time being, the discovery is actually good news.
Today, only about 25% of Midwestern corn contains Bt -
current varieties are not as effective against insects as is modified
cotton.
So the remaining 75% is helping to keep earworms
susceptible to Bt cotton. "Corn is serving as a great refuge,"
says entomologist Bruce Tabashnik at the University of
Arizona in Tucson, who describes the new results as "very exciting".
But if the percentage of Bt corn increases - which, with new
varieties in development, could happen soon - then moths
feeding on Bt corn all summer may rapidly come resistant.
Flying south to feed on cotton later in the year, their
offspring could well be immune to the effects of Bt cotton as
well. "If 90% of corn in the Midwest becomes Bt then we
could be in real trouble," says Gould.
Scale of the problem
Because caterpillars feed on several crops and moths move
around, "it's difficult to know where a moth grew up as a
caterpillar", Gould explains.
Fortunately, moths are what they ate as
caterpillars. Gould's team analysed the ratio of two
different types of carbon, 12C and 13C, in the dusty
scales on the wings of moths collected in the
cotton fields of Louisiana and Texas. This approach
is usually used to estimate the age of ancient archaeological remains.
Cotton and corn plants contain slightly different
ratios of carbon isotopes, as they have slightly
different ways of photosynthesizing. This
distinction is recorded in the tissues of insects that
ate grasses such as corn when they were
caterpillars, and those that munched broad-leafed plants such as cotton
or soybeans.
Many of the moths that the researchers collected in October
- late in the cotton season - had grown up on grasses. "They
can't be coming from Texas or Louisiana," says Gould: corn
is harvested in the south much earlier. The moths must
have migrated from the cornfields of the Midwest.
References
1.Gould, F. et al. Bacillus thuringiensis resistance
management: Stable isotope assessment of alternate
host use by Helicoverpa zea. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, published online,
doi:10.1073/pnas.242382499 (2002). |Article|
(c) Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2002