http://www.marketwatch.newsalert.com/bin/story?StoryId=Copvgqb9DtdeZody0mG&FQ =c%25MTC%20&Title=Headlines%20for%3A%20MTC%0A UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) official sees risks from gene foods Reuters Company News - April 13, 2000 05:32 By David Brough ROME, April 13 (Reuters) - A senior official of the U.N.'s world food body has acknowledged "potential risks" from genetically modified organisms (GMOs) to human health and the environment and advised risk assessment on a case by case basis. "We do acknowledge that there are potential risks, either for the human health or for the environment," Hartwig de Haen, an Assistant Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organisation, told Reuters. "We therefore advocate risk assessment, case by case," he said. He said there were concerns over the possible spread of allergies via the transfer of genes from one plant to another. "But whether or not that will be the case depends on which gene you take from which plant and transfer to which other plant or crop commodity," he added. De Haen, who heads the economic and social department and is a third ranking official of the FAO, said the organisation had no empirical evidence on health risks from foods developed from biotechnology. Environmental groups strongly oppose testing of genetically modified crops, fearing natural cross-pollination will spread the new genes into conventional cultivation. Critics of the biotech crops say there is not enough research to conclude the crops are safe for the environment and for human consumption. In an interview with Reuters in February, FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf said the U.N.'s world food body believed genetically modified crops could provide an opportunity to alleviate world hunger, but food safety must be ensured. He said existing knowhow excluding gene technology was sufficient to generate enough food to meet the needs of developing countries today, in theory. WORRIES OVER SEEDS De Haen said FAO would be "seriously concerned" if so-called "terminator" seeds returned to the market because they were at odds with an age-old tradition in which farmers hold back some of their grain from harvest to plant the following year. Last October, U.S. biotechnology group Monsanto Co decided not to develop the "terminator" technology, which would prevent plants from producing fertile seeds, forcing farmers to buy more seed from the supplier. "Terminator genes have been introduced to give the provider of the seeds the possibility to control the use of those seeds," De Haen said. "The use of such seeds prevents farmers from following the old practice of re-using their own seeds, and it has the risk that farmers who are not fully informed about the infertility of those seeds, and yet use them again (the following year), might suffer complete failure of their crop."