Biotech crop allegations against Monsanto detailed USA: December 16, 1999 WASHINGTON - Six corn and soybean farmers from Indiana, Iowa and France filed a class action lawsuit against Monsanto Co , accusing the company of trying to monopolise genetically modified crops and failing to thoroughly test the products for safety. Monsanto denied the charges and said it would fight the lawsuit. Also named in the court case as co-conspirators were Novartis AG , DuPont Co , Dow Chemical Co , and AstraZeneca Plc . Lawyers for the farmers said the companies were not formally charged as defendants in the case, but could be added to the lawsuit in the future. Monsanto was named as the defendant because it is the "hub of the genetically modified industry and the other companies are the spokes," attorney Michael Hausfeld said. The following are allegations made by the farmers in a 62-page lawsuit filed in U.S. district court in Washington: ANTITRUST ALLEGATIONS - In 1996, Monsanto tried to "neutralize competition" and control prices and restrain trade in genetically modified corn and soybean seed markets by licensing its Yieldgard and Roundup Ready technologies to competitors. An internal Monsanto document described a plan aiming to eventually control 90 percent of the U.S. corn seed market; - Monsanto and its co-conspirators formed a cartel with nearly identical licensing agreements required of farmers who wanted to purchase Monsanto's biotech seeds. The agreements included expensive technology fees, high prices for the seeds, and user agreements prohibiting farmers from replanting their own harvested seeds. The technology fees collected from U.S. farmers by the companies will total an estimated $454 million this year; - Monsanto tried to force farmers buying its Roundup Ready soybeans to also buy Roundup herbicide to maintain the profitability of the herbicide. The herbicide has generated an estimated $1.6 billion in annual sales but has a patent due to expire next year; - Monsanto and other cartel members failed to carry out adequate human health and environmental safety testing; - Monsanto attempted to acquire water rights in countries with water shortages in a move to control the "basic means of production of the global food supply"; - Monsanto manipulated the conventional seed market by "restricting research and development" into new varieties, and "restricting the availability" of the traditional seeds; - Monsanto and its co-conspirators have intimidated farmers by filing more than 475 lawsuits for allegedly saving genetically modified seeds or sharing it with other farmers; - Monsanto hired Pinkerton guards to investigate farmers with conventional crops suspected of improperly obtaining the genetically altered seeds. DECEPTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICE ALLEGATIONS - Monsanto told farmers and the public that genetically altered seeds and crops were rigorously tested for health and environmental risks but did not adequately test them; - Monsanto's inadequate testing is harmful to farmers using conventional seeds because their crops are "at risk from intermixing" with genetically modified commodities and rejected by overseas buyers. REUTERS NEWS SERVICE